{{Quickfixn}} questions on component block concepet in quickfix

[Jie Zhu]

Gotcha, thank you for the explanations.

From: Quickfixn [mailto:quickfixn-bounces at lists.quickfixn.com] On Behalf Of Grant Birchmeier
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 2:48 PM
To: Mailing list for QuickFIX/n
Subject: Re: {{Quickfixn}} questions on component block concepet in quickfix

Yes, that is pretty much correct.  (Although it should be noted that the Instrument component contains more fields than that, of course.)

You might be interested in reading my answer to this StackOverflow question:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29772481/difference-between-group-and-component-in-quickfix-j



On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Jie Zhu <Jie.Zhu at icbkfs.com<mailto:Jie.Zhu at icbkfs.com>> wrote:
So if a component block is not in a repeating group, we don’t even need that component block, am I correct?

The following two specs will be same, right?



--
Grant Birchmeier
Connamara Systems, LLC
Made-To-Measure Trading Solutions.
Exactly what you need. No more. No less.
http://connamara.com
This email and any attached files are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this email. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore is in no way liable for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which may arise as a result of email transmission. If verification is required please request a hard copy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quickfixn.com/pipermail/quickfixn-quickfixn.com/attachments/20180306/8f4970e8/attachment.htm>