{{Quickfixn}} How to prevent rejection of message missing an *optional* field.
Manuel Lopez
lopez.post at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 15:12:36 PST 2014
Mike,
Thanks. The language is from the spec, but I think it has generated
questions because the meaning isn't so clear or applicable. In my
case there was no conditional field at all (having a field whose value
when set requires the presence of another field, --which would make
for a convoluted definition file to figure out). So I would have
expected only a "field access error" or "field not found error" or a
plain null exception error message with the field tag number -- but
it's clear now with the explanation.
-Manuel
>>FYI, the error message comes straight from the FIX specification.
>>See tag 380 for reference:
>>http://www.fixtradingcommunity.org/FIXimate/FIXimate3.0/en/FIX.5.0SP2/tag380.html
--
Mike Gatny
Connamara Systems, LLC
More information about the Quickfixn
mailing list